Community Talk

When outsourcing logistics doesn’t outsource the worries

·Updated 12.03.2026·9 min read
When outsourcing logistics doesn’t outsource the worries

KoneX Community Talks™ — Real Worries, Real Stories

In this edition of KoneX Community Talks™, we share the story of a fast-growing D2C brand that outsourced logistics to become more agile, but discovered new concerns along the way. About scalability, margin pressure, dependency and the importance of oversight when growth accelerates.

About this KoneX Community Talks™ series: Anonymized conversations with e-commerce professionals about the pressures, doubts and operational concerns that often go unspoken. By sharing these stories, we aim to build a strong and connected community where everyone can learn from each other.


Converting fixed costs for internal fulfillment to Flexible outsourced costs does not solve all problems

Recently I spoke with the founder of a fast-growing premium slipper brand, a direct-to-consumer business that started with a simple idea: high-quality, comfortable footwear for home and quiet moments.

In the early days he did almost everything himself.
He rented a modest storage space, packed boxes, coordinated with seasonal workers, and watched each order notification like a small victory. But as the brand grew, the combination of strong seasonality, fixed warehouse costs, and limited staffing flexibility began to weigh on him. Today, he runs a much leaner operation by outsourcing fulfilment and returns to a major marketplace logistics network. On paper, the model is efficient and scalable. In reality, not all worries disappeared, they simply changed form. This is his story.


Who he is

  • Role: Founder of a digital-native footwear brand
  • Category: Premium slippers and home footwear
  • Market: North America, with ambitions to expand into Europe
  • Business model: Direct-to-consumer webshop combined with marketplace sales
  • Seasonality: Strong winter and gifting peaks
  • Early setup: Rented warehouse of approximately 1,500 dollars per month with seasonal staff
  • Current setup: Webshop and marketplace listings with outsourced fulfilment and returns
  • Systems landscape: Shopify, marketplace tools, a returns app, and separate reporting sources
  • Key shift: From fixed warehouse and staffing costs to variable per-item logistics costs

Our conversation

When you look back at the early days of your brand, what stands out most?

“I remember doing everything.
Picking, packing, printing labels, then answering customer emails at night. We had a small warehouse, a fixed monthly rent, and seasonal helpers. It was exciting, but also fragile. If a season was weaker, that rent still had to be paid. If a season was strong, we were scrambling to keep up.”


What made the setup feel fragile to you?

“The seasonality.

  • In the low season, there wasn’t enough work to justify permanent staff.
  • In the peak season, on the contrary, there was much more work than the same small team could handle.

Hiring full-time staff did not feel responsible. Hiring too many seasonal workers felt risky.

And the warehouse rent, about $1,500 a month, was always running.

  • We could store roughly 7,000 items.
  • Storing fewer items increased the average cost per item.
  • Storing more meant hitting capacity limits without guaranteed sell-through.

At what point did you decide something had to change?

“It was a mix of financial and mental pressure.
I wanted more flexibility, fewer fixed commitments.
So we started a parallel track. We kept our own webshop, but also listed on a major marketplace and used their logistics services, multi-channel fulfilment and distributed warehousing. The idea was simple:

  • Turn storage, packing, shipping, and returns into variable per-item costs
  • Instead of a large fixed monthly bill and staffing complexity

How did that new model change your day-to-day reality?

“On many levels, it was a relief.
Outsourcing all operations really allowed me to shift my focus from working in the business to working on the business.
Before that, so much of my time and energy went into packing and shipping that I didn’t have the capacity left to work on growth. This was especially important during the holidays.
Picking and packing pulled me away from customer service and marketing, precisely when those activities mattered most.
Instead of a warehouse bill, we moved to an all-in cost per item, roughly seven dollars per pair for storage, fulfilment, and return handling.
That meant:

  • No fixed warehouse rent
  • No long-term staffing commitments
  • Built-in scalability during peak seasons

I could finally focus on product, brand, and sales, instead of worrying about staffing the packing table in December.”


That sounds like a big win. Where did new worries appear?

“They shifted toward margin and dependency.

  • The marketplace takes a percentage of every sale, around 15 percent of revenue.
  • On top of that comes the per-item logistics cost.
  • And then there are advertising clicks.

Individually, each cost makes sense.
Together, you feel how much margin flows into the ecosystem.
At the same time, large established brands can play a different

  • They can aggressively discount individual SKUs to gain market share.

As a smaller brand, you feel that pressure.
You need to remain profitable, not just visible.”


You mentioned returns as a specific pain point. What’s challenging there?

“Returns are handled by the marketplace and a returns app we use.
Operationally, it works, items come back and credits are processed.

But there is one major gap, visibility.

  • I don’t receive photos of returned items.
  • II don’t always see why a product was returned or in what condition.

So I’m partly in the dark:

  • Was sizing unclear?
  • Did the colour differ from expectations?
  • Is there a recurring quality issue with a specific batch?

Zonder die context is het lastiger om product of klantreis te verbeteren. En wanneer klanten contact opnemen, heb ik niet altijd het volledige verhaal.”


How does this influence your view on customer satisfaction?

“It makes proactive service more difficult.

  • Most customers are understanding when they feel truly heard.
  • But without basic return information, I’m reacting rather than anticipating.

The process works at scale.
It just isn’t designed for brands that want to understand why things went wrong, not only that they did.”


You’re also considering expansion into Europe. What worries you about that step?

“Europe is attractive, I genuinely believe the product could succeed there.

But the complexity lies here:

  • The marketplace services I rely on in North America aren’t consistently available across Europe.
  • In some countries, that marketplace isn’t the market leader.
  • Local expectations around delivery speed and service are already very high.

Expanding would mean breaking up the current outsourced model:

  • Some orders handled by one partner
  • Others by local fulfilment providers
  • Possibly another partner for returns

It quickly becomes a patchwork. And I’m not sure how to manage that without losing oversight or spending excessive time on integrations.”


Looking ahead to the holiday season, what sits most in the back of your mind?

“Two things:

  • I want the customer experience to remain consistent, even though the backend operation is complex.
  • I want to make smart decisions about inventory and pricing, while effectively renting logistics capacity and paying per click.

I don’t want to be locked into one ecosystem.
But I also don’t want to rebuild an entire warehouse operation in every market. That balance keeps me thinking.”


The worries

His concerns are not dramatic outliers. They are realistic, familiar, and often shared by fast-growing online brands:

  • Uncertainty about how much margin remains after marketplace fees, logistics, and advertising
  • Dependency on a single ecosystem for storage, fulfilment, and visibility
  • Limited insight into return reasons and product condition
  • Difficulty converting return patterns into actionable product improvements
  • The feeling of operating partly blind in customer service around returns
  • Concern that international expansion will fragment logistics and systems
  • Doubt about balancing operational simplicity with long-term strategic control
  • The lingering question of whether this model is as scalable and resilient as it appears

These are not failures.
They are the normal tensions of a brand that has outgrown doing everything in-house, without yet regaining full visibility.


Wat we notice across the industry

Many digital-native founders follow a similar journey:

Phase 1 — Hands-On Everything

  • Renting a small warehouse
  • Managing seasonal staff directly
  • Touching every order at least once

Phase 2 — Outsourcing for Flexibility

  • Using marketplace logistics and distributed warehousing
  • Converting fixed costs into variable per-item costs
  • Gaining operational relief and peak-season scalability

Phase 3 — New Invisible Risks

  • Margin pressure through layered fees
  • Strategic dependency on a single platform
  • Limited access to granular operational data, especially around returns
  • Fragmentation when expanding internationally

Founders do not fear hard work.
What they increasingly worry about is invisible complexity.


Our advice how KoneX could be helpful

Aan het einde van het gesprek vroeg ik hem:

At the end of the conversation, I asked what he would have wanted to solve first if he had known about KoneX earlier.

He identified two priorities.

1. Turning Inventory Into a Smart Pricing Lever

  • Linking real-time inventory data to pricing logic
  • Defining simple rules for scarcity-based price increases or promotional discounts
  • Running these rules automatically without manual updates

2. Preparing for Multi-Country Expansion Without Rebuilding Everything

  • Using KoneX as a neutral integration layer
  • Connecting webshop, marketplaces, and local fulfilment and return partners
  • Creating a single flow for orders, inventory updates, and return metadata

Not because KoneX stores all data indefinitely. But because it orchestrates information flows so visibility can scale with the business.


Why this story matters

Outsourcing logistics removes operational pressure.But it does not automatically remove strategic and emotional pressure. Growing brands want to keep a grip.

  • On margin.
  • On customer feedback.
  • And to their future.

Share Your Story

Would you like to participate in a future edition of KoneX Community Talks™?

We protect your anonymity unless you choose otherwise.

Whether you run a niche D2C brand, sell via marketplaces, or scale internationally, your experiences help others navigate similar decisions.

Reach out anytime.
Let’s build a community around real eCommerce stories.

Read how KoneX helps companies achieve flexible and scalable fulfillment